Water security of Ukraine: war time and climate change

There is not enough water, and it is also being stolen

Historically, the climatic and geographical conditions of mainland Ukraine are favorable for the development of agriculture. Due to its intensity, this led to the highest percentage of plowed land in Europe — 53% — and to inefficient use of water resources. However, the climate is changing. Over the last 140 years, the average annual air temperature on Earth has increased by 1.1°С, in Ukraine this indicator has increased by 1.2°С only in the last 30 years. The higher the air temperature, the faster moisture evaporates from the soil and water resource. While the North and West of Ukraine are relatively well supplied with water, the water deficit in the center is 159–222 mm per year, and in the South it is more than 460 mm.

From the data shown in the picture, it can be seen that the Southern, Eastern and some Central regions of Ukraine are of critically shortage of water reserves. According to the study, the situation will only worsen due to climate change. These changes are already felt by farmers and affect the development of agriculture in Ukraine. In 2020, farmers lost part of their harvest due to the drought, the worst in Ukraine in the last 40 years. Last year, losses of winter wheat and barley amounted to about 50% of the amount harvested a year earlier. The corn harvest was completely lost on 203 000 hectares of sown land, and very low yields were obtained on 718 000 hectares. Thanks to the extensive irrigation system, which covered approximately 300 000 hectares, the Kherson Region reached its average yield that year. However, the proper operation of this system depends on the water balance of the Dnipro River and is related to the supply of water to the North Crimean Canal.

Water security in wartime

Russian aggression added new problems to Ukrainian agriculture: mined fields, polluted soil, destroyed or stolen agricultural machinery, sowing and harvesting took place under constant shelling. According to calculations by the Kyiv School of Economics, the repair and replacement of the irrigation infrastructure alone in the affected regions will cost 225 million USD.

An additional problem is illegal withdrawal of Dnipro water by the occupiers from the Kakhovka Reservoir and its supply to Crimea with violation of technological requirements. Back in March, the State Environmental Inspection of Ukraine very roughly estimated that the occupiers steal water for more than UAH 32 million per day, so as of mid-August, the amount of damages for the illegal supply of Dnipro water to the territory of the peninsula may have exceeded UAH 5 billion. It is impossible to fully assess the losses, because the Kakhovskaya HPP is still occupied.

These losses are not compensated by natural hydration. According to the Ukrhydrometeorological center, despite the rains and sometimes short showers, water levels in most rivers of Ukraine continued to decrease in July. The total volume of lateral inflow of water to the reservoirs of the Middle Dnipro in July was only 118 million cubic meters, which is 45% of the norm. Forecasts for the future are also disappointing. Even after the end of the war, the de-occupation of all Ukrainian lands and the restoration of the irrigation system due to climate change, the volume of fresh water in most river basins of Ukraine will continue to decrease. This means that the agriculture of our country will constantly experience a shortage of water, and therefore it is critically important to adapt it to climate change, taking into account the decrease in water content of rivers and the issue of water security in the region.

Crimean context: from dew to Dnipro water

Before the start of the North Crimean Canal (1963), most of the Crimean Peninsula (especially its Northern part) was not suitable for intensive agriculture due to the aridity of the climate. There are no large rivers on the territory of the peninsula, and those that exist are located in the Mountainous Crimea and the Southern coast of Crimea. Tobacco, grapes, apricots and some other fruits were grown there. In conditions of limited access to water, the local population had to be resourceful, so the Crimean Tatars had unique technologies for collecting water and using it rationally, which made it possible to grow fairly moisture-loving crops in arid regions. For example, in some areas, in order to irrigate fruit trees, they were lined with boulders, which cooled overnight, and in the morning, condensation - dew - collected on them. Due to the forced deportation of the Crimean Tatars by the Soviet authorities, most of the local traditional agricultural practices were lost.

The Soviet authorities were interested in the development of the Crimean peninsula as an agricultural region, so the construction of a canal began in 1957 to supply water from the Dnipro to irrigate fields where they had never been before. After the completion of construction, the North Crimean Canal provided 80–85% of the Crimean Peninsula's needs for fresh water, most of which was allocated to the needs of agriculture and helped to increase grain yields by at least sevenfold.

Even rice was cultivated in the North of Crimea, which requires a large volume of water. Accordingly, when the supply of Dnipro water to the temporarily occupied Crimea stopped in 2014, agriculture began to decline, and the area of ​​irrigated land decreased 13 (!) times.

According to international humanitarian law, which protects the civilian population during war, ensuring the needs of people in the occupied territories is the sole responsibility of the occupying authorities. At the same time, in eight years, the occupation authorities in Crimea have not taken any steps to somehow take care of the region's water security. Instead, they actively began to use underground water, which led to salinization of groundwater and in some areas the upper soil layers.

On February 24, 2022, immediately after the start of the full-scale invasion, the Russian military seized the main construction of the North Crimean Canal and a few days later blew up the temporary dam and the main bulkhead structure of the canal to allow water into Crimea. Everything points to the fact that the restoration of water supply through the North Crimean Canal was one of the goals of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

We would like to invite the Dutch businesses to signal about their ideas and interest to contribute to the process of reconstruction on the webpage of the RVO.  Bijdragen aan de wederopbouw (rvo.nl) and follow it for the updates.